"Archeologists are Planning to Scan the Great Pyramid of Giza With Cosmic Rays With Such Detail, They Should see Every Hidden Chamber Inside" - UniverseToDay February 28, 2022 by Evan Gough
jeudi 3 mars 2022
EGP : Une nouvelle mission d'exploration de la Grande Pyramide
"Archeologists are Planning to Scan the Great Pyramid of Giza With Cosmic Rays With Such Detail, They Should see Every Hidden Chamber Inside" - UniverseToDay February 28, 2022 by Evan Gough
mercredi 2 février 2022
Le sarcophage de Mykérinos : porté disparu
![]() |
| Le sarcophage de Mykérinos - Ebers, Georg. "Egypt: Descriptive, Historical, and Picturesque." Volume 1. Cassell & Company, Limited: New York, 1878 |
![]() |
Vue perspective du sarcophage de Mykérinos d'après Perring Tome I de "l'histoire de l'art dans l'antiquité", Perrot et Chipiez, 1882 |
Marc Chartier
sources :
Jean-Jacques Fiechter, Mykérinos : le dieu englouti, Maisonneuve & Larose, 2001
Egyptos.Net - L'Égypte des pharaons Actualité Égypte (archives 2008
Gaston Maspero, Histoire ancienne des peuples de l'Orient classique
lundi 13 décembre 2021
"L'érection des pyramides fut l'accomplissement d'une pensée qui tenait aux croyances religieuses les plus profondes, relativement à l'avenir" (duc de Raguse)
![]() |
| photo de Luigi Fiorillo (1847 - 1898) |
L'impression que les pyramides de Ghizéh font éprouver varie d'une manière singulière, selon la distance d'où on les voit. En remontant le Nil, dès qu'on les a découvertes à l'horizon, elles grandissent constamment à l'œil, à mesure qu'on avance vers le Caire ; près de cette ville on dirait que ce sont des montagnes, et quand on réfléchit que ces montagnes si régulières sont sorties de la main des hommes, l'étonnement s'unit à l'admiration. C'est ce que nous éprouvâmes, il y a trente-huit ans, quand nous nous disposions à combattre à leur ombre et que Napoléon nous disait : "Soldats, du haut de ces pyramides quarante siècles vous contemplent !"
C'est du Caire que les pyramides apparaissent dans toute leur gloire. Digne ornement d'un pays dont les souvenirs ont tant d'éclat et remontent si haut dans les siècles écoulés, elles sont là comme pour rendre témoignage de ce que fut cette contrée que nous avons peine à comprendre, et qui exerça sur le monde une puissance que son étendue et sa population ne semblaient pas lui promettre. Une résidence habituelle au Caire accoutume à regarder les pyramides comme une des nécessités de cette terre, comme une parure qui lui est propre ; on ne conçoit pas que le paysage puisse en être dépouillé, elles en font partie comme un ouvrage de la nature.
À mesure qu'on approche des pyramides on croirait qu'elles s'abaissent et que leurs dimensions s'amoindrissent. Soit que l'œil s'habitue à leur aspect imposant, soit que le désert uni et monotone qui les entoure, n'offrant aucun point de comparaison, empêche d'apprécier leur masse énorme, il est certain que l'effet qu'elles produisent va toujours en s'affaiblissant. On le sent et l'on s'en étonne, sans pouvoir se soustraire à celte impression ; mais elle est passagère. Quand on arrive jusqu'à les toucher, quand on lève la tête et que les regards s'élancent vers leur sommet, lorsqu'enfin on en fait le tour et qu'on mesure ainsi leur étendue, la surprise renaît, et, en se rappelant les plus grands monuments que l'Europe possède, on se dit que si l'église de Saint-Pierre de Rome ou celle de Strasbourg étaient transportées ici, la croix qui les domine ne serait pas de niveau avec la plate-forme ; que si le Louvre était adossé à cette pyramide, le faîte ne correspondrait pas à la moitié de sa hauteur ; alors l'admiration subjugue, et ce que vous voyez a le prestige d'une illusion des sens."
extrait de Voyage en Hongrie, en Transylvanie, dans la Russie méridionale, en Crimée et sur les bords de la mer d'Azoff, à Constantinople et sur quelques parties de l'Asie Mineure, en Syrie, Palestine et en Égypte, Volumes 4 à 5, 1841, par
Auguste-Frédéric-Louis Wiesse de Marmont (1774-1852), Duc de Raguse. Ce Maréchal de France participa aux campagnes de Napoléon, le "trahit" à Fontainebleau en 1814, puis servit les Bourbons, dut défendre les ordonnances en 1830 comme commandant de l'armée de Paris, et volontairement s'exila, voyageant en Autriche, en Syrie, en Palestine et dans les États de Venise.
La pyramide de Chéops est "la plus durable des créations humaines" (D. S. Merejkovski )
![]() |
| Photo Zangaki, vers 1880 |
"Je ne peux pas décrire, car de deux choses l’une : ou bien mes paroles ne rendront pas la millième partie de ce qu’il faut dire ou, si j'en donne l’image la plus pâle et la plus faible, on me prendra pour un homme exalté, peut-être même pour un fou. Je ne puis dire qu’une chose : ces hommes bâtissaient comme des géants hauts de cent coudées." C’est Champollion qui parle ainsi de toute l'architecture égyptienne et l'on pourrait dire cela des pyramides en particulier.
C'est Philon de Byzance qui en parle le mieux dans son livre Des sept merveilles du Monde : "Les hommes y montaient vers les dieux, et les dieux y descendaient vers les hommes."
(...) Ç’aurait été une tâche difficilement réalisable, même avec nos moyens techniques actuels, que d’aménager comme le firent les architectes égyptiens de la IV° dynastie, dans l’épaisseur de masses de pierre telles que les Pyramides, des chambres intérieures, des couloirs, des galeries qui, malgré une pression de dizaines de millions de kilogrammes, conservent après soixante siècles leur régularité primitive, sans avoir dévié d’un point.
Dans le tombeau de Chéops, malgré des milliers d’années, malgré les tremblements de terre qui ébranlèrent toute la masse de la pyramide, pas une pierre n’a bougé d’un cheveu. Jamais personne n’a bâti et probablement ne bâtira plus solidement. C’est la plus durable des créations humaines.
Les blocs cyclopéens de granit sont si exactement joints qu'on ne peut glisser entre eux une aiguille ; ils sont polis comme une glace, et leurs facettes sont pareilles aux facettes d’un cristal parfait.
C'est la perfection, non plus du cristal, mais du vivant tissu organique.
Les rois constructeurs des pyramides furent "des tyrans cruels qui obligèrent le peuple à élever des tombeaux inutiles, témoignage de leur vanité insensée". La confiance naïve avec laquelle Hérodote raconte cette fable montre à quel point les Grecs eux-mêmes avaient déjà perdu la clé de l'antiquité égyptienne. Non, ces rois ne furent pas de cruels tyrans, mais des libérateurs qui délivraient du plus honteux des esclavages - l'esclavage de la mort, et la conduisaient victorieusement vers la Résurrection.
Si une tension, une concentration aussi inouïe des forces physiques et spirituelles d’un peuple entier fut possible, c’est seulement parce que la volonté d’un seul coïncida avec la volonté de tous. Et ce n’est point dans une tristesse servile que durant vingt années ces cent mille hommes peinèrent après la pyramide de Chéops, mais dans une joie enivrante, dans une sage démence, dans une perpétuelle extase de la foi et de la prière. Ce n’est pas le gémissement des victimes qui monte de dessous ces prières, mais le cri victorieux de l’homme qui a vu pour la première fois le chemin ouvert dans le ciel par la pointe des pyramides.
"Les pyramides correspondent aussi à certaines constructions de l'esprit, qui ne sont certainement pas tout à fait intelligibles à l'homme d'aujourd'hui" (Marcel Brion)
Les voyageurs d'autrefois, un Diodore de Sicile, un Hécatée de Milet, un Hérodote, s'émerveillaient des pyramides, autant que le touriste moderne. Pour eux, d'ailleurs, les "Pyramides", c'était le célèbre trio de Giseh, qui rassemble les plus monumentales et les plus renommées ; ils ignoraient, ou dédaignaient les autres, d'aspect moins colossal et moins imposant ; moins bien conservées aussi et d'un accès moins facile. Leurs dimensions énormes ont frappé les soldats de la demi-brigade qui accompagnait Bonaparte, et son escorte de savants. C'est par elles qu'ont commencé les travaux de l'égyptologie. Elles demeurent le monument le plus connu, le plus étudié, le plus spectaculaire aussi, et à vrai dire, pour le profane, le plus saisissant.
Ces monuments sont importants à plusieurs titres, d'abord comme édifices représentatifs de certaines formes d'expression et de pensée, puis comme témoins de moments capitaux de l'histoire de l'Égypte. Il y a dans cette histoire, l'"époque des pyramides". Avant elle, les tombeaux étaient de vastes constructions terrestres, à l'image du palais, et s'efforçaient de reproduire celui-ci exactement dans tous ses éléments, contenant et contenu.
Après l'"époque des pyramides", les rois préféreront creuser leur tombe dans la montagne elle-même, plutôt que d'accumuler une montage artificielle, au-dessus et autour de leur chambre sépulcrale. Ils penseront rendre, par ce moyen, leur dernière demeure inaccessible aux importuns qui voudraient troubler leur repos. Les caveaux royaux des pyramides ont probablement été pillés d'assez bonne heure, ce qui incita les pharaons à adopter un autre genre de sépulture.
Les pyramides correspondent donc à certaines données architecturales mais aussi à certaines constructions de l'esprit, qui ne sont certainement pas tout à fait intelligibles à l'homme d'aujourd'hui. En tant que phénomène artistique et en tant que phénomène historique, les pyramides cernent une période de l'histoire égyptienne, dans laquelle on put englober des monarques par ailleurs aussi différents que le sont ceux des IIIe, IVe et Ve dynasties. Chez tous ces pharaons on constate, en effet, un goût croissant de la grandeur, allant jusqu'à l'excès et la démesure, une plus forte emprise du pouvoir monarchique, un sens extraordinaire de la vie d'outre-tombe, qui les conduisent à bâtir ces prodigieux tombeaux.
Étudier l'évolution, puis la décadence de la pyramide elle-même, c'est écrire l'histoire de ces rois. Rien ne résume mieux le caractère et la signification de leur règne que le tombeau qu'ils se sont construit.
Chaque pyramide, en effet, est l'œuvre du roi qui doit l'habiter pour l'éternité. Il n'a pas assez de confiance dans la piété de ses successeurs pour croire que ceux-ci lui-donneront une sépulture digne de lui. Il s'assure, de son vivant, la maison de son immortalité. Il en commence la construction au moment où il monte sur le trône. Il arrive même parfois que, pour quelque raison mal définie, le premier tombeau lui paraissant insuffisant, il en fasse construire un second, plus digne, semble-t-il, de sa puissance, de sa richesse et de sa majesté.
Étudier les pyramides c'est, en réalité, rassembler les données les plus importantes sur l'histoire d'Égypte entre 2778 environ et 2142 selon la chronologie la plus sûre ; il existe aussi des pyramides tardives mais celles-ci sont, historiquement, esthétiquement, des archaïsmes. Les pyramides ont beaucoup à nous apprendre, mais elles gardent aussi beaucoup de secrets. Ceux-ci ne sont pas toujours ce qu'on appelle les fameux "secrets des Pyramides" dont la recherche plaît aux amateurs de chimères et aux abstracteurs de quintessences, quoiqu'il soit certain que la science égyptienne, dès ce temps-la, possédait en astronomie, en mathématiques, des connaissances prodigieusement développées et, qu'au point de vue ésotérique, elles soient riches des significations les plus singulières et les plus intéressantes."
extrait de Histoire de l'Égypte, par Marcel Brion (1895-1984), essayiste, historien d'art, romancier, avocat, critique littéraire, grand voyageur, élu à l’Académie française le 12 mars 1964.
jeudi 25 février 2021
La construction des pyramides égyptiennes selon Leslie Grinsell - 5e partie : méthodes de construction, chronologie
The following table embodies the chief available data :
(...)
Maintenance.
The drain on the country’s resources did not end when the pyramid complex was completed ; for a large staff of priests, overseers, and other officials were maintained, not only during the king’s lifetime but also for some centuries after his death. It was inevitable that such a state of affairs could not long continue, and the system eventually collapsed for economic and other reasons. Some of the kings were not above rewarding their favourites with funds misappropriated from the mortuary endowments of their predecessors.
With the passage of time each pyramid complex tended to be built smaller and smaller, and more and more crudely, although some exceptions there naturally were. By the latter part of Dynasty XII the main body of pyramids had degenerated to mud-brick, limestone being reserved merely for the internal chambers and passages and external casing. After Dynasty XIII no more pyramids were built, except some very degenerate examples not to be compared with those of the Old and Middle Kingdoms. Very soon afterwards the whole sixty-mile range of pyramids from Gîza to Maidûm had become a desert solitude.
extrait d' Egyptian Pyramids, 1947, par Leslie Grinsell (1907-1995), archéologue et conservateur de musée anglais. Durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il a rejoint la Royal Air Force et a servi en Égypte, où il s'est familiarisé avec les vestiges archéologiques de l'Égypte antique.
La construction des pyramides égyptiennes selon Leslie Grinsell - 4e partie : la superstructure, l'intérieur et l'extérieur, la fermeture des pyramides
(a) Interior (Old Kingdom Pyramids)
(1 ) The Core. In the earliest pyramids, such as the Step Pyramid of Djeser at Saqqâra and the pyramid of Snefru at Maidûm, the substructure was covered by a mastaba-like edifice, either rectangular (Djeser) or square (most other examples), having a slope-angle of 75-80 degrees. The Step Pyramid was formed around this core by the addition of masonry both vertically and horizontally, giving the impression of a series of mastabas one above the other. Until the early part of Dynasty XII the core of the pyramids was usually of blocks of coarse limestone, faced with rather larger blocks.
(2) The Intermediate Walls. The royal tombs of Dynasty II were conjecturally reconstructed by Reisner with a series of walls outside of the mastaba-core. From Dynasty III onwards these walls occur in every pyramid sufficiently ruined to display its structure until the end of the Old Kingdom and probably the beginning of the Middle Kingdom. According to Petrie they were 'for binding the structure, and in a traditional succession from the primitive mastaba’. The intermediate walls were placed one outside the other, the outer ones being lower than the inner, on all four sides of the core, thus producing a stepped-pyramidal form. The slope angle of each wall was about 70 degrees, but steeper slopes occasionally occur.
Each intermediate wall consists normally of two parts :
a. The body of small blocks of coarse limestone.
b. The casing of large blocks of finer limestone.
The Step Pyramid at Saqqâra is essentially a very high mastaba core surrounded by a series of walls. The tops as well as the sides of these walls were cased with fine white limestone blocks which were dressed and smoothed into the finished stepped structure. The intermediate walls of Snefru at Maidûm were likewise cased with fine white limestone which was dressed smooth although later hidden behind the final casing of the pyramid ; for in this instance the gaps between the steps were filled in to form the earliest known true pyramid. From Dynasty IV onwards the facing of the intermediate walls was left rough. The construction of the various walls probably proceeded together at the same time and more or less at the same level. Good examples of exposed intermediate walls are to be seen at the Maidûm pyramid of Snefru, the small pyramids near those of Kheops and Mycerinus at Gîza, and the pyramids of Abu Sîr.
(3) The Backing Stones. After filling in the triangular gaps between the steps of the intermediate walls, it was necessary to add well-laid masonry which was to constitute a backing for the casing of the pyramid. These backing stones are nearly always of fine white limestone. In some instances the fitting together of the backing stones does not fall far short of the quality of jointing of the casing blocks. The outer faces of the backing-stones were often inscribed with graffiti written thereon by the architects, builders’ scribes and others. Some of them are of the nature of vertical and horizontal lines with extended triangles, and measurements in cubits ; these are evidently for measuring the progress of the work and checking the batter of the pyramid. Other graffiti, such as one on the west side of the pyramid of Neit at S. Saqqâra record the state of advancement of the building on a particular date. Others give the names of the crews of workmen employed, the name of the king whose tomb was being built, and other details.
(b) Interior (Middle Kingdom Pyramids)
Instead of having a core, intermediate walls, and backing stones, the pyramids of the Middle Kingdom were nearly all built on a different principle, the body of the pyramid being constructed of a series of walls radiating from the centre, their interstices being filled with mud bricks or other materials.
(1) The Interior Walling consisted of two walls crossing at right angles parallel to the sides of the pyramid, which divided it into four sections. Diagonal walls caused a subdivision into eight sub-sections, and often there were additional walls which made sixteen divisions in all. At the pyramid of Sesostris I at Lisht the walls were of limestone ; at the pyramid of Sesostris II at Lahûn the lower parts of the walls were of limestone and the upper parts of mud-brick ; in most other Middle Kingdom pyramids the walls were entirely of mud-brick.
(2) The Filling of the divisions between the interior walls was of mud-bricks or sand and rubble.
(3) Backing Layers and Backing Stones, between the body of the pyramid and the casing was a series of carefully laid bricks or ‘backing layers’ and backing stones, which were necessary in order to receive the limestone casing blocks.
(4) Making of Mud-Bricks. The manufacture of mud-bricks in ancient Egypt was similar to that of to-day. The method consists of getting a quantity of Nile mud or alluvium, mixing it with water until the resulting mass becomes plastic, and adding sand or chopped straw to give coherence and to prevent the bricks from warping when drying. The wooden mould (of which ancient and modern examples are identical) is rinsed with water to prevent the mud from sticking to the inner sides, and is then filled with the mud mixture. The resulting bricks are left in the sun for four or five days to dry, after which they are ready for use. By this method, which is best carried out by subdivision of labour (one mixing the mud, one man moulding, and one laying the bricks to dry) 4,000-6,000 bricks per day can be produced by three men.
The length of the bricks in the Middle Kingdom was twice their breadth, which enabled them to be laid ‘headers and stretchers.’ (...)
(c) Exterior (Old and Middle Kingdom).
(1) The Casing.
The casing of most pyramids was of fine white limestone, but granite was used for the first sixteen courses of that of Mycerinus, and for the lowest part of the casing of the pyramids of Khephren, Djedefrê, and Neferirkarê. The casing stones were first of all dressed to a smooth surface on their under sides, and then they were placed in position with the aid of levers. Their tops were next dressed, and marked with incised lines to indicate the position of the stones to be super-imposed. The front sides of the casing’ blocks were dressed last of all, and they were dressed from the apex of the pyramid downwards. This is shown at the pyramid of Mycerinus, where several of the red granite casing blocks are undressed and still have the projecting lugs to receive the positioning levers. On account of the premature death of Mycerinus the dressing of the casing of his pyramid was left uncompleted. The probability that limestone casing blocks were likewise dressed after being placed in position is revealed by a study of the pyramids of Djeser and Kheops ; but Petrie considered that they were sometimes dressed before being placed in position.
(...) In the setting of casing blocks a gypsum mortar was often used, but as a lubricant and not as a cement.
Pyramids of the Middle Kingdom sometimes have their casing blocks joined together with dovetail-cramps as at the pyramid of Sesostris in at Dahshûr. It has already been noted that during Dynasty III the masonry of the superstructure of pyramids tended to be inclined downwards from the casing towards the core. From Dynasty IV onwards the masonry was usually laid in horizontal courses on a level plane.
(2) The Pyramidion.
The apex of the pyramid was formed by a single block or pyramidion. In the Old and Middle Kingdoms this pyramidion was probably always of a black or grey-black stone, especially black granite (Ammenemes III) or basalt (Khendjer II). At other times pyramidia were occasionally of white limestone (Intef, Dynasty XI, in British Museum ; and the pyramidia of some of the private tombs of Dynasties XVIII and XIX at Deir el Madîna, Thebes). Pyramidia usually have a boss or disc projecting from their base, so that they could be firmly secured on a corresponding hollow cut in the stones on which they were to be placed.
No pyramidia of the Old Kingdom have yet been found ; but in his biographical text Uni relates how he was sent by King Mernerê to Ibhet (in Upper Egypt) to bring ‘the costly and splendid pyramidion for the pyramid called ‘‘Mernerê shines and is beautiful". The Egyptian Museum at Cairo contains nearly all the known pyramidia of Middle Kingdom ; they include the polished black granite example of Ammenemes III (Dynasty XII), and those of Khendjer II, his unknown neighbour, and Menneferrê (Dynasty XIII). The two examples at the foot of the pyramid of an unknown king adjoining the pyramid of Khendjer II are both unfinished and one of them still possesses the red guide lines intended to assist the mason in his work.
The Closing of the Pyramid
The closing of the tomb against robbers after the king had been buried presented a serious problem to the kings and their architects ; it worried Kheops so much that he was for ever seeking the locks of the Sanctuary of Thoth, 'to make for himself the like thereof for his "Horizon" (i.e. pyramid).'
The chief methods of closing the pyramids after the interment were as follows :
(a) Sealing the Sarcophagus
The sarcophagi of Unis and Pepy II, and probably others, were intended to receive a wooden coffin let into it by ropes, grooves for which are still visible in those sarcophagi. Previous to the burial, the sarcophagus lid rested on mud-brick walls beside the sarcophagus (Old Kingdom), or was supported above it by piles of stones (Middle Kingdom). The lid was fixed on to the sarcophagus by an ingenious method combining oblique bevelling of three sides with the slotting of the fourth side, the fitting being assisted by the use of a resinous substance which served as a fixative as well as a lubricant. From a glance at Fig. 8 (cf. ci-dessus) the difficulty of breaking into a sarcophagus closed in that manner will be readily understood.
(b) Sliding the Portcullis Slabs
The horizontal passage leading from the sarcophagus chamber nearly always contained between one and three portcullis slabs. In the Old Kingdom they were of granite and dropped down vertically ; in the Middle Kingdom they were often of quartzite and slid across a slightly inclined transverse plane. In each case their object was to block the horizontal passage against intruders.
The methods of lowering the vertical portcullis slabs are as yet not fully understood. Borchardt suggested that they were sometimes suspended and subsequently lowered by a pulley and palm-log device. In other instances they were propped up by stones until the interment had been made, and then gradually lowered by removing the stones, assisted by levering. The latter was certainly the method intended to be used in the unfinished mastabas at Maidûm, the portcullises of which were never lowered, and were still propped up by stones when discovered by Petrie.
(c) Blocking the Ramp
Nearly every pyramid has a ramp extending downward from the entrance to the horizontal passage. After the portcullis slabs in the horizontal passage had been lowered, the ramp was filled with masonry. Nearly all the pyramids have since been reopened and their ramps cleared out, but the following instances of blocked ramps are on record :
(1) Pyramid of Kheops ; Vyse stated that the sloping passages were blocked with solid masonry for their whole length.
(2) Pyramid of Khephren ; Vyse stated that the lower entrance and passage were completely filled up with solid masonry, closely jointed and cemented ; the first stone was ten feet long, and the others six or seven.
(3) Pyramid of Snefru at Dahshûr still has the western entrance and most of the western ramp blocked with masonry.
(4) Pyramid of Ammenemes I at Lisht had the ramp blocked by granite monoliths.
(5) Pyramid of Sesostris I at Lisht had the ramp filled with obelisk-shaped granite monoliths, each between 7 and 9 metres long. As each was slid down the ramp with the pointed end foremost it crashed into its predecessor, causing the pointed ends to become truncated and fissured.
(6) Pyramid of Neuserrê at Abû Sîr still has two blocking-stones in the ramp.
d) Concealing the Entrance.
The entrance to each pyramid was concealed from recognition by being blocked with skilfully fitted masonry. Instances of flap-doors, although authentic (as in the pyramids of Snefru and Kheops, are most likely posterior to the construction of the pyramids. Concealment of the entrances to pyramids was assisted by the natural tendency for blown sand to accumulate to a much greater extent in the centre of each side than at the corners. This tendency is clearly shown on air-photographs of pyramids.
extrait d' Egyptian Pyramids, 1947, par Leslie Grinsell (1907-1995), archéologue et conservateur de musée anglais. Durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il a rejoint la Royal Air Force et a servi en Égypte, où il s'est familiarisé avec les vestiges archéologiques de l'Égypte antique.
La construction des pyramides égyptiennes selon Leslie Grinsell - 3e partie : fondations et infrastructures
(a) Preparation of the Pyramid Area
In certain instances, as at the pyramids of Abu Rauwâsh and Lahûn, and also at the tomb of Khentkawes at Gîza, the tomb superstructure was sited on a natural rock massif, which enabled a superstructure of the desired size to be constructed with a considerable saving of labour. In these instances the only levelling required consisted of dressing the natural rock surface for the reception of the masonry to be added.
In other cases a sloping surface has been levelled at great expense and labour in order to provide a suitable base. This has been done at the pyramid of Khephren, where the desert surface has been cut away considerably on the north-west part and built up on the south-east.
It has been suggested that the process of levelling was assisted by banking up the square base-area and flooding it, and then marking the water level on the inner sides of the bank. The plane of the base of the pyramid of Kheops slopes upwards from north-west to south-east to the extent of six inches, and this could have been caused if a slight north-west breeze was blowing at the time of the checking of the levelling by flooding.
After the levelling had been completed, the whole base area was often paved with slabs of fine white limestone. This is well seen around the base of the pyramid of Kheops, although it is thought that the paving does not extend over the whole area. Sometimes the paved base-area extends outside the pyramid to form an exposed pavement, as at the pyramid of Sesostris I at Lisht, where the paving stones were joined together by dovetail cramps.
(b) Foundation Deposits.
Our knowledge of the foundation deposits of pyramids is derived almost entirely from those of the Middle Kingdom. They consist mainly of specimens of the materials used in the construction of the pyramid complex, inscribed sometimes with the names of the king and his pyramid. Foundation tablets of brick, metal, stone and wood, bearing the name of Nebhepetrê Mentuhotpe, were found in the pyramid-temple of that king at El Deir el Bahari.
Beneath the south-west corner of the pyramid of Ammenemes I was a foundation deposit consisting of an ox-skull, some small and badly broken pottery vases and saucers, and six clay bricks. Each brick contained a tablet inscribed with names of the king and his pyramid ; two tablets were of copper, two of faience, and two of limestone.
Beneath the north-west, south-west, and south-east corners of the pyramid of Sesostris I were foundation deposits of food offerings, pottery, and bricks containing tablets of some of the materials used in the construction of the pyramid and temple. The tablets were of wood, metal, faïence, and alabaster, and were inscribed with the name and titles of the king and the name of his pyramid, ‘Sesostris Surveying the Two Lands’. From the overlapping of the different objects it was determined that the meat offerings were dropped in first, then the pottery, and then the bricks. In the south-east corner there were two deposits, one of which was probably inserted when the pyramid was completed.
The pyramid of an unknown king of Dynasty XIII, south-west of that of Khendjer II, contained foundation deposits of coarse pottery and models of copper and bronze implements.(c) Foundation Ceremonies.
Fragments of reliefs from a granite door-jamb of Khasekhemuy and from the solar temple and pyramid complex of Neuserrê, when studied in the light of more complete representations of later date (as at Edfu), provide a clear idea of the main episodes of the foundation ceremonies for a pyramid or other structure of Old or Middle Kingdom. These episodes were :
(1) Pegging the ground and stretching the cord ;
(2 ) Breaking the ground surface (usually done four times) ;
(3 ) Sprinkling of sand ;
(4 ) Making of bricks (done four times at Abu Girab) ;
(5 ) Laying the bricks.
The last two episodes may have been a survival from predynastic and Thinite times, when tombs were made of brick before the invention of stone masonry. The ceremonies appear to have been performed by the king, with the assistance of goddesses, sem-priests, ritualists and others.
The Substructure
The first step in the construction of the pyramid consisted of hewing out of the bedrock, with copper chisels, adzes, and other implements, those parts of the passages and chambers which were to be below ground level.
Good examples of these, open to the sky, are to be seen at Abu Rauwâsh and the unfinished north pyramid of Zâwyet el 'Aryân. The latter is of special interest as an example of an unfinished pyramid in which the substructure was nearly completed but the superstructure not even begun. The impressive stairway, ramp, passage, and sarcophagus chamber had been hewn out of the bedrock, and sarcophagus chamber had been paved with granite and received the fine red granite sarcophagus ; then for some unknown reason the work was abandoned.
It is well to distinguish between the ‘open trench’ substructure (Abu Rauwâsh and Zâwyet el ‘Aryân) and the ‘tunnelled’ substructure, seen in the lower passage and chamber of the pyramid of Kheops, the pyramids of Kheops’ queens, and the pyramids of Mycerinus and his queens.
(a) The Sarcophagus Chamber was usually wholly or partly in the substructure. The most important exception is the pyramid of Kheops, in which the position of the sarcophagus chamber was altered from the substructure to the superstructure in the course of building. It was generally lined with granite (Kheops and Mycerinus) or fine white limestone (as in the pyramids of Dynasties V and VI containing Pyramid Texts). The roofing was :
(1) Corbelled as in the Dynasty III pyramids at Dahshûr and Maidûm.
(2) Pointed as in the pyramids of Dynasties V and VI.
(3) False-arched with slabs placed end to end and hollowed concave on their undersides, as in the chambers of Mycerinus and Shepseskaf.
It is evident that the roofing blocks were cut to shape, arranged, and numbered before being placed in position ; indeed the roofing blocks of Djeser and Kheops have their markings and numbering still visible ; but those of Djeser were reversed in orientation when laid. In view of the great weight of superincumbent masonry which had to be borne by the roof of the sarcophagus chamber one or other of the following devices was used :
(*) Relieving chambers, as above the king’s chamber in the pyramid of Kheops.
(**) Relieving slabs, often of enormous thickness, as above most of the chambers with pointed roofs of Dynasties V and VI. Architects’ inscriptions on the walls of the antechamber and sarcophagus chamber of the tomb of Shepseskaf (Mastabet Fara’ôn) which read ‘upper side of the paving stone, true line’, almost certainly show that the walls were built before the floor-slabs were inserted.
The presence of the sarcophagus in the unfinished chamber of the north pyramid of Zâwyet el ‘Aryân, shows that the sarcophagus was dragged down the smooth rock-hewn ramp, which had a narrow stairway on each side as a foothold for the workmen, before the ramp was walled with stone slabs. That this was the usual custom is shown by comparing the dimensions of sarcophagi with those of completed passages and ramps. The sarcophagus of Queen Neit (Dynasty VI) is actually wider than the passage, while the horizontal or other passages in the pyramids of Kheops, Khephren, Mycerinus, Unis, and Pepy II are too narrow to have permitted the movement of the sarcophagus, the clearance space being either non-existent or less than 10 centimetres.
(b) The Antechamber,Serdab, Horizontal Passage and Vestibule presented no constructional problems other than those encountered in building the sarcophagus chamber.
(c ) The Portcullis Slabs of the Old Kingdom were normally of granite and let down vertically, although that in the Dahshûr pyramid of Snefru was let down obliquely. During the Middle Kingdom the portcullis slabs were frequently of quartzite and were nearly always slid transversely across a slightly inclined gap over the passage which they were intended to block. Before being let down, the Old Kingdom portcullis slabs were supported on piles of stones, as seen in unfinished mastaba tombs of Dynasty III at Maidûm. As a protection for the tomb, portcullis slabs had little effect as the robbers always worked their way under, above, or around them.
(d) The Ramp normally slopes downwards from the entrance to the horizontal passage of the pyramid. The angle of slope was usually between 15 and 30 degrees, although it was only 10 degrees in the pyramid of Ammenemes I at Lisht. Two important reasons for the downward-sloping ramp were to facilitate the lowering of the sarcophagus and canopic chest, and to assist in the blocking of the means of ingress by sliding down monoliths after the deceased had been interred. The pyramids of Dynasties III and IV had their entrance high up in the superstructure, and the ramp was therefore at least partly in the superstructure. From Dynasty V onwards the whole length of the ramp was in the substructure. In either case it had nearly always a flat roof, and the walls and roof were often lined with slabs of red granite or limestone.
extrait d' Egyptian Pyramids, 1947, par Leslie Grinsell (1907-1995), archéologue et conservateur de musée anglais. Durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il a rejoint la Royal Air Force et a servi en Égypte, où il s'est familiarisé avec les vestiges archéologiques de l'Égypte antique.
mercredi 24 février 2021
La construction des pyramides égyptiennes selon Leslie Grinsell - 2e partie : les matériaux et leur transport
The ancient quarrying of fine limestone was divided into two main operations :
Rekhet landing stage'. It is possible that some of these quay-sides may have later served the lower temples of pyramids, as quays have been found near the lower temples of Sahurê, Neuserê, and Unis.
La construction des pyramides égyptiennes selon Leslie Grinsell - 1e partie : études préliminaires, intervenants, organisation du chantier, outils, saisons
Organisation of the Workmen
Appliances
(1) Copper chisels, for quarrying limestone.
(2) Built causeways, for facilitating transport of stone from quarry to pyramid.
(3) Sledges, rollers, and sleepers, for transporting stones.
(4) Water, for levelling.
(5) Construction-embankments of mud-brick, for assisting in placing the higher courses of masonry ; remains of such embankments of mud-brick and rubble have been found at Maidûm, Lisht (Ammenemes I), and Gîza (near the pyramid of Khephren.
(6) Levers, for assisting in placing the stones into position.
(7) Plumb-rules, one of which was found near the pyramid of Sesostris I at Lisht.
(8) Set-squares, one of which was likewise found at Lisht.
(9) Ropes.
(10) Saws, used for cutting hard stones, e.g. note the saw-marks on the sarcophagi of Kheops and Khephren and behind the slate triads of Mycerinus. The length of the saw-marks on the sarcophagus of Kheops shows that the saw used was at least 8 ft. long.
(11) Dolerite pounders, for working and dressing granite and other hard stones ; they abound in the vicinity of all granite workings
(12 ) Tubular Drills, for hollowing the insides of hard stone sarcophagi and for working hard stones generally. That used in hollowing the sarcophagus of Kheops was 4.2 ins. diameter, as shown in two places where it was allowed to run too deep.
(13 ) Wooden moulds, for making mud-bricks.
(14 ) Plaster, for filling gaps and holes in masonry. The plaster was tinted red if used to fill flaws in red granite.
(15 ) Facing-Plates smeared with red ochre were, according to Petrie, applied to the casing stones to test their smoothness. Protuberances were shown by the red ochre adhering to them.
The Work of the Seasons













