lundi 29 août 2011

“Une architecture grandiose, dans sa forme la plus simple” (Edward Bell - XXe s. - à propos des pyramides de Guizeh)

De l’ouvrage d’Edward Bell The architecture of ancient Egypt - a historical outline, édité en 1915, j’ai retenu pour Pyramidales les quelques extraits ci-après, dont je propose l’articulation suivante :
- il n’était pas “inhabituel”, de la part des rois d’Égypte, de se faire construire une “seconde tombe”, en plus de leur monument funéraire principal ;
- les pyramides pour les rois ; les mastabas, pour les personnes moins haut placées ;
- le développement pyramidal du mastaba, dans l’architecture funéraire des Égyptiens ;
- l’absence de traits architecturaux mineurs dans la construction des pyramides ;
- description de la pyramide de Khéops ;
- les pyramides ont été érigées du vivant des rois pour lesquels elles étaient construites ;
- le Sphinx a été taillé “in situ” et “il est probable que la tradition le mettant en relation avec Khéphren ait quelque fondement”.

“Sun-dried bricks had formed the material for building, though stone was sometimes employed in details as in Tjeser's (*) mastaba, or for the granite flooring found in the tomb of Den-Semti a king of the 1st dynasty. But it seems to have occurred to Tjeser to substitute stone for brick, for another monument built by him consists entirely of limestone. It was by no means unusual for kings to have a second tomb, a custom originating possibly in the desire that the so-called ka, or "double", should find a temporal retreat both at Abydos, where it was supposed that Osiris was buried, and at some other site associated with the life or death of the deceased ruler ; though it is not always clear which is the actual sepulchre and which the secondary one. Tjeser accordingly built a stone mastaba at Sakkara, near Memphis, on which, it is assumed, he afterwards imposed another of smaller area, and repeated the process as time went on, until he had produced what is known as the Step-pyramid. It has altogether six stages of a total height of 195 feet, and the area of its base is 390 from N. to S. and 347 from E. to W.

Supposed formation of the pyramid of Medûm (Petrie)
The original mastaba was surrounded by a stone casing, and another smaller mastaba was erected on the top, leaving a ledge all round. The process was then repeated till the topmost addition was quite small when the ledged surfaces were filled up to form planes.

The fashion thus set was followed by Senefru, the last king of the IlIrd dynasty, who built himself an imposing tomb at Medûm, between the Nile and the district known as the Fayum, in which he was afterwards buried. It was constructed, like the Sakkara step-pyramid, of a series of mastabas, but the sides were filled out so as to form a continuous slope, and thus the first real pyramid was produced. It was afterwards partially destroyed by Rameses the Great, who used the fine stone of the casing for buildings of his own, and the existing structure is only the core of the original monument. In front of the east side is a small chapel which is the oldest known temple in Egypt. Senefru is also supposed to have built another pyramid at Dâshûr, nearer to Memphis. It is possible that it is the one the sides of which have two planes of inclination, and which, as it is almost unique, may be assumed to be an experimental form of the type which attained such perfection under the next dynasty.
The pyramid, evolved in this manner, became the type for royal monuments during the early Memphite dynasties, but for less exalted persons of distinction the mastaba continued in use, preserving generally its outward form though internally it often received a good deal of architectural decoration. Hundreds of such tombs, as well as many pyramids in various states of preservation, fill the western side of the the Nile Valley above Memphis, and form probably the largest necropolis in the world. It extends from Abu Roash on the north to Dâshûr on the south, including the plains of Giza, Abusir and Sakkara, a length of fifteen miles with a width of from two to two and a half miles.
At Giza the mastabas are methodically arranged in regular ranks with their longer axes due north and south, but at Sakkara the arrangement is less regular and they sometimes encroach on one another. Within each is generally found a comparatively small interior chamber serving as a shrine or chapel, and annexed to this is a walled-up cell, or more than one, in which a statue of the deceased was deposited, not as a visible memorial but rather as a guarantee that the ka or double might find its mortal counterpart still whole and undecayed. This faith in the prolongation of the conditions of earthly life which so strongly characterizes the Egyptian race is further illustrated by the custom of depositing, within or outside the tomb, food and drink and models of objects associated with the former existence of the dead. (...)

The pyramidal development of the mastaba by Senefru led to the adoption of this form by the kings, and culminated in the three great pyramids of Giza, the tombs of Khufu (Cheops) Khaf-Ra (Chephren) and Menkau-Ra (Mykerinos) of the IVth dynasty. These magnificent monuments exhibit grand architecture in its plainest form ; yet simple as is their design it is by no means wanting in interest or variety, for their quadrangular plan, whilst ensuring perfect symmetry, gives
the intersections of their sides a constantly varying angle as the point of view is changed. Moreover,
their impressiveness is increased by their situation on a rocky plateau which is some 150 feet above the level of the Nile and the cultivated area.
The largest and oldest, that of Khufu, is about 775 feet on each side, and when it was intact was about 480 feet in vertical height. That of Menkau-Ra, the smallest and latest in date, is about 346
feet square and 215 feet high. The intermediate one, of Khaf-Ra, is only a few feet less in height than Khufu's and from some points of view looks the highest.
Except for the small internal chambers and the galleries which led to them, they are solid structures, chiefly of limestone brought from the quarries on the east bank of the Nile. When perfect they had smooth external surfaces, the remains of which are only visible on some of the upper courses of that of Khaf-Ra, the rest having been removed for use as building material in the modern Cairo.
There was an entire absence of minor architectural features, and the entrance in each case was carefully concealed by the casing, which consisted of blocks of stone, fitted on the stepped courses which are now visible, with the outer surfaces carefully chamfered to the required angle. So far as workmanship is concerned they show a complete command of method and material, for in the geometrical exactitude of their laying out and in the fineness of their jointing they are not surpassed or even equalled by the work of any later period.
The internal arrangement of the galleries and the position of the sepulchral chambers varies in each pyramid. In that of Menkau-Ra, which is built over a depression in the bed-rock, the tomb-chamber is below the level of the soil, but in the case of Khufu's it is in the centre of the mass, and there is another which is known as the Queen's Chamber (though it has no sarcophagus within it) at a somewhat lower level in the pyramid. There is a still lower chamber, below the level of the soil, approached by an absolutely straight passage sloping down from the entrance, the use of which is not apparent.
About sixty-three feet from the entrance of this descending passage another gallery branches upwards to a point at which a level passage leads to the "Queen's Chamber", and from the same point a great gallery 28 feet high and 151 feet long ascends to the King's Chamber. The
smaller galleries are roofed by inclined stones which meet in an internal ridge so as to diminish the vertical pressure, but the great gallery is covered by corbelled courses of stone which gradually approach and meet above. The stones of the side walls are admirably fitted together so that the joints are scarcely visible.

The King's Chamber, which is 34 feet 6 inches long by about 17 feet wide and 19 high is covered by flat slabs of granite, and the walls, are of the same material, very finely jointed. It contains an empty lidless sarcophagus massively hewn out of a block of red granite without ornament or inscription.
Above the King's Chamber is a peculiar arrangement of five cavities separated by horizontal blocks, the uppermost being covered by two inclined rows of stone rafters, with the object of diverting the pressure from the ceiling of the chamber. (1)

The galleries are all constructed and concealed with a view to secure the tomb from violation and at certain points are intercepted by huge plugs of granite which were inserted from above in
order to place what seemed to be insuperable obstacles in the way of any depredators. In some cases it was only by excavating new approaches that these obstacles were circumvented.

It is evident from the care and labour which were expended on these vast monuments, that they must have been erected during the lifetime of the kings whom they commemorate and the Prussian egyptologist Lepsius, who conducted an archaeological expedition to Egypt in the middle of the last century, promulgated the theory that they were enlarged at successive periods in accordance with the length of the reigns of their builders, as was almost certainly the case with those which originated in mastabas. Without accepting this theory as literally as some more recent German writers, Dr Borchardt came to the conclusion that the Great Pyramid actually received additions to the dimensions originally planned, and this fact may explain the existence of the lower untenanted chambers which were superseded as the structure was enlarged.
The pyramid of Khufu has on its east side three smaller pyramids, which were the tombs of members of his family, and is surrounded by many mastabas. There are also three small pyramids on the south side of that of Menkau-Ra.The height of these smaller monuments varies from fifty to seventy feet. It was usual to surround large pyramids with a paved enclosure, and in some cases a causeway leading from the Nile to the enclosure was constructed apparently before the building was begun. (...)
The gigantic figure of the Sphinx, which is 140 feet in length and 66 feet high, when not partly covered by sand, lies about 540 yards to the east of the pyramid Khaf-Ra with whom a late tradition associates it. It was carved in situ from a natural mass of rock, the apparent height of which is increased by the surface of the surrounding ground having been removed ; the body is a good deal weathered, and has the appearance of having been patched up with pieces of sandstone. The human head was formerly painted red, and had the conventional beard common in royal portraits, but is now much mutilated ; on the breast between the forepaws there is a small open shrine with an enclosed space and an altar in front. A paved court farther in front with steps leading down to it is said to date from the Roman period.
The figure was an object of veneration for centuries, and there is a record of its repair by Thothmes IV of the XVIIIth dynasty, but the date of its first carving is doubtful. Mr. H. R. Hall assigns it to the Xllth dynasty, but it seems unlikely that the block was left untouched by the pyramid builders of the IVth dynasty, and it is probable that the tradition connecting it with Khaf-Ra has some foundation. (...)
The body of the Sphinx is perforated by a shaft from the centre of the back indicating an earlier grave below it, and as
there are no tombs in the immediate neighbourhood older than Khaf-Ra's reign, it may be taken for granted that the Sphinx is not of earlier date.”

(1) Such expedients show that the principle of the radiating arch was not commonly recognized at that period. The earliest arch hitherto found is, however, assigned to the IlIrd dynasty and is of somewhat rude construction.

(*) Je reproduis cette orthographe telle qu’adoptée par l’auteur : il faut évidemment lire “Djoser” ou “Djeser”.

Source : archive.org

vendredi 26 août 2011

Selon Walter Scott Perry (XIXe s.), les pyramides égyptiennes ont été construites à l’aide l’un plan incliné en terre

Walter Scott Perry fut directeur de I’École des beaux-arts et des arts appliqués au Pratt Institute de Brooklyn (NeyYork), et secrétaire honoraire de la Fondation pour l’Exploration de l’Égypte, créée en 1882 par Amelia Edwards.
Sa description des pyramides égyptiennes, telle que l’on peut la lire dans Egypt, the land of the temple builders, 1898, présente les quelques particularités suivantes :
- mention y est faite des air-shafts (“conduits d’aération”) de la Chambre du Roi, dans la Grande Pyramide ; par contre, on n’y trouve aucune allusion à ceux de la Chambre de la Reine (observation confirmée par le croquis joint au texte) ;
- le transport des blocs de pierre jusqu’au sommet (“till the top”) des monuments a été effectué à l’aide d’un plan incliné de terre (“incline of earth”) ;
- lorsque Joseph fut vendu en Égypte et qu’il y devint intendant de la maison de Pharaon, les pyramides à l’Ouest du Caire avaient plus de 1.000 ans d’existence ;
- l’étude de certains détails architecturaux de l’intérieur de la pyramide de Mykérinos prouve que déjà, à cette époque très reculée, les bâtisseurs avaient imaginé la construction d’un plafond en forme de voûte (“a roof having the appearance of an arch”).
À part ces observations particulières, l’auteur se contente d’une relation très “classique”, sans doute empruntée à des sources qu’il nous faut imaginer dans la mesure où elles ne sont pas mentionnées.

“The sides of the three great pyramids of Gizeh - Cheops, Chephren, and Mycerinus - face the four cardinal points of the compass. Cheops measures, approximately, seven hundred and fifty feet on each of the four sides. It is four hundred and fifty feet, in height and covers an area of nearly thirteen acres. Its estimated weight is about seven million tons. Let one consider any ground-area of thirteen acres of land with which he is familiar, and in imagination pile upon it, in pyramidal order, blocks of stone with an average thickness of three feet, until the apex shall reach a point four hundred and fifty feet from the foundation, and he will then have gained some idea of the colossal dimensions of this silent witness of more than five thousand years of human life and activity.
The first requirement for the actual construction of the pyramid appears to have been the levelling of the rock surface. This was probably followed by the excavation of the subterranean
chambers and the building of a foundation of stone reaching up to the level of the surrounding sands.
This foundation was then covered with a layer of stones about three feet thick. Stones for another similar layer were
rolled up an incline of earth and put in place. Then other layers were added till the top was reached. The incline of earth was raised as needed for each platform and when all were in place the earth was removed. Thus the great pyramids may have reached their gigantic proportions. 
The summit was crowned with a pyramidal stone and the step-like spaces on the surface were filled so as to form a solid mass with four sloping sides. As in due course of time this surface covering has disappeared, the summit is now accessible. But to climb to the top of one of these pyramids, under any circumstances, is no easy matter ; for the true steepness is not measured by the slant of the long lines from the angles of the base to the apex (...), but by the slope of the outline presented by a face view. (...)
Through a study of the ancient Egyptians' belief in the immortality of the soul and the consequent preservation of the body after death, we arrive at the true purpose of the construction of the pyramids situated along the plateau of the great burial-grounds of which the necropolis of Sakkarah is a part.
Even a man of humble origin who had risen to importance might erect, for the reception of his mummy and his portrait-statues, a tomb that should withstand the ages. It behooved a greater man, such as the king of all Egypt, to raise a monument consistent with his rank and power, in the form of a pyramid that should bear testimony to his greatness centuries after he had passed away. And they builded better than they knew, for, when Joseph was sold into Egypt and became ruler over Pharaoh's household, the pyramids west of Cairo had endured for more than a thousand years.
The great pyramid of Cheops, it will be remembered, is seven hundred and fifty feet square at its base and four hundred and fifty feet in height. The entrance was found forty-eight feet above the foundation. The first passageway is four feet in height and a little over three feet in width. It was made to descend a distance of three hundred and twenty feet. This passageway to subterranean vaults was doubtless built in order to lead from the true location of the sarcophagus any who might break into the tomb.
At a distance of sixty feet from the entrance and at a point originally blocked up by huge stones, is the beginning of a long inclined corridor leading to the centre of the pyramid. The first section of this passage is one hundred and twenty-three feet in length, and five and one-half feet in height. A horizontal passageway leads to what is called the "Queen's Chamber," a room eighteen feet square and twenty feet high. The ascending corridor continues for another distance of one hundred and fifty-five feet, and this part is twenty-eight feet in height and of a width varying from three and one-half feet at the lower end to about seven feet at the upper end. At the end of this corridor is another narrow horizontal passage connecting with the "King's Chamber". Nothing was found in this chamber but the remains of a granite sarcophagus.
The "King's Chamber" is thirty-five feet long, seventeen feet wide, and nineteen feet high. The floor is one hundred and forty feet above the foundation. The walls and ceiling of the room are lined with granite. In order to relieve the pressure, five horizontal slabs, with spaces intervening, were placed above the main roof of the hall. In the last space were found inscriptions in red paint upon the stones, with the name of Khufu (Cheops) upon them.
Two small air-shafts were carried obliquely upward to the outside surface of the pyramid ; one being nearly two hundred and forty feet in length. The second pyramid, that of Chephren, although not so large as that of Cheops, contains nearly five million tons of masonry. Its passageways leading into the interior chambers are similar in construction to those in Cheops, but are not so easy of access. The "King's Chamber" is of about the same size as that in the first pyramid. In it was found a sarcophagus that had been ransacked and was filled with debris.
In
the third pyramid the tomb-chambers are below the foundation, and cut into the solid rock. In one was found a sarcophagus, which, according to the inscription, once contained the body of Mycerinus, its builder. This pyramid is very interesting as furnishing an illustration of the fact, that, even so far back as the time of the pyramid-builders, there was the desire to construct a roof having the appearance of an arch. This was secured in the tomb-chamber by leaning stones one against another at an angle, and cutting away the inner surface so as to produce the appearance of a vault.
As has been said, the remains of sarcophagi found in these pyramids show conclusively the use for which they were constructed, and also illustrate the religious thought regarding the preservation of the body against all possible attempts at annihilation. 



One of the chief objects of interest associated with the pyramids is the Sphinx of the desert.
Hewn out of the solid rock to a height of sixty-six feet and spreading its great length one hundred and forty feet along the ground, it lies like some huge petrified form of prehistoric birth, half buried in the undulating sands. A tablet that has been found records the fact, that as early as the time of Thothmes III., about 1500 B. c, it was still partly covered with sand ; for on this tablet Thothmes makes record of a dream in which he is entreated by the Sphinx to clear away the sand.
To the Egyptians the Sphinx was a symbol of Horus, the early morning sun, the new-born light of morning, which had conquered darkness and overcome death with life. Facing the east, the Sphinx reflects the brilliancy of the sunrise, which illuminates the world after its conflict with the powers of darkness. It was thought that the kings were elected to represent the sun-god upon the earth, and the Sphinx was therefore symbolic of the divine nature of their mission.”

Source : archive.org

jeudi 25 août 2011

Selon A.H. Sayce (XIXe-XXe s.), Hérodote a visité le site de Guizeh en période d’inondation ; d’où sa méprise concernant la partie souterraine des pyramides

Le linguiste-orientaliste anglais Archibald Henry Sayce (1846-1933) fut professeur d'assyriologie à l’Université d'Oxford de 1891 à 1919.
Dans son ouvrage The Egypt of the Hebrews and Herodotos, édité en 1896, il donna son point de vue sur les conditions du voyage d’enquête effectué par Hérodote en Égypte.
Le Nil était alors en période de crue et les terres étaient inondées. “C’est donc en bateau”, selon A.H. Sayce, que l’historien grec se rendit au site de Guizeh et qu’il “a dû visiter les pyramides”, accompagné de son guide-interprète. De là à conclure qu’un canal amenait l’eau du Nil jusqu’au tertre sur lequel avaient été bâties les pyramides, il n’y avait qu’un pas qu’Hérodote franchit “aisément”, en ignorant le niveau exact de la chambre la plus basse de la Grande Pyramide par rapport au niveau le plus haut de l’eau.
Hérodote
Le même flou dans les observations faites ou les informations reçues a été la cause d’une autre bévue dans le récit d’Hérodote, lorsqu’il s’est agi, pour l’historien, de relater l’aspect que devait présenter le revêtement de la pyramide de Khéops, avec ses supposés hiéroglyphes. Le raisonnement de Sayce vaut ce qu’il vaut, mais il mérite qu’on le prenne en considération : ”En réalité, voici ce qui semble être l’explication la plus simple à ce qu’Hérodote dit à propos des hiéroglyphes : comme maints autres voyageurs, il a oublié de noter où étaient exactement les inscriptions, et quand il a entrepris d’écrire son livre, il a supposé qu’elles étaient sur la pyramide elle-même”... alors que lesdites inscriptions n’étaient ni à l’intérieur, ni à l’extérieur de la pyramide, mais dans une tombe adjacente.
“Hérodote a donc commis une erreur” : à ce stade de notre inventaire, qui sera surpris d’une telle conclusion ?

“The strange error he [Herodotos] twice commits in imagining that there were vaults under the pyramid of Kheops in an island formed by a canal which the builder had introduced from the Nile is due to the same cause. Doubtless his dragoman had told him something of the kind. A subterraneous chamber in the rock actually exists under the great pyramid, as was discovered by Caviglia, and there are pyramids into whose lower chambers the Nile has long since infiltrated. Professor Maspero found his exploration of the pyramids of Lisht, south of Dahshûr, stopped by the water which had filled them, and Professor Petrie had the same experience in the brick pyramid of Howara, though here the infiltration of the water seems to have been caused by a canal dug in Arab times.”

Photo Lehnert et Landrock (1920)
“But the pyramids of Gizeh stand on a plateau of limestone rock secure against the approach of water, and the story reported by Herodotos is more probably the result of misapprehension on his own part than of intentional falsehood on the part of his guides. His ready credence of it, however, can be explained only by the condition of the country at the time of his visit. The whole land was covered with water, and in going to Memphis he had to sail by the pyramids themselves. It was in a boat that his visit to them must have been made ; and it was easy, therefore, to believe that a canal ran from the water on which he sailed through the tunnelled rock whereon they stood. He did not know that the lowest chamber of the pyramid was high above the utmost level of the flood.”

“Surprise has often been expressed that Herodotos should make no mention of the Sphinx, which to Arabs and modem Europeans alike has appeared one of most noteworthy monuments of Gizeh. But in sailing along the canal which led from Memphis to the pyramids he would have passed by it without notice. As his boat made its way to the rocky edge on which the huge sepulchres of Kheops and Khephren are built, it would have been concealed from his view ; and buried as it was in sand his guides did not think it an object of such surpassing importance as to lead him to it over the burning sand. In the immediate neighbourhood of the great pyramid he was surrounded by monuments more interesting and more striking, which were quite enough to occupy his day and satisfy his curiosity. (...)
Herodotos went to the pyramids of Gizeh by water, across the lake on the western side of the city, which he states had been made by Menes, and then along a canal. At Gizeh his love of the marvellous was fully satisfied. He inspected the pyramids and the causeway along which the stones had been brought from the quarries of Turah for building them, and listened reverentially to all the stories which his guides told him about them and their builders. The measurements he gives were in most cases probably made by himself. But in saying that there were hieroglyphic inscriptions “in the pyramid”, he has made a mistake. There were no inscriptions either in it or outside it, unless it were a few hieratic records left by visitors on the lower casing-stones of the monument.
At the same time it is certain that Herodotos saw the hieroglyphs, and that his guide pretended to translate them, since they contained, according to him, an account of the quantity of radishes, onions, and leeks eaten by the workmen when building the great pyramid, as well as the amount of money which it cost. But the vegetables represented Egyptian characters - the radish, for instance, being probably rod (“fruit” or “seed”), and the mention of them is a proof that it really was a hieroglyphic text which the dragoman proposed to interpret. It is even possible that the guide knew the hieroglyphic symbols for the numerals ; if so, it would explain his finding in them the number of talents spent by Kheops upon his sepulchre, and it would also show that the inscriptions were engraved, not “in the pyramid”, but in an adjoining tomb. In fact, this seems the simplest explanation of what Herodotos says about them : like many another traveller, he forgot to note where exactly the inscriptions were inscribed, and when he came to write his book assumed that they were in the pyramid itself. (...)
Whatever might have been the reason, Saqqâra and its Serapeum were unknown to the dragomen, and consequently to Herodotos as well. He must have started for the Fayyûm from Memphis and have sailed up the channel of the Nile itself. If he noticed the pyramids of Dahshûr and Mêdûm, they would have been in the far distance, and have appeared unworthy of attention after what he had seen at Gizeh. Soon after passing Mêdûm, however, it would have been necessary for him to leave the river and make his way inland by the canal which joined the Bahr Yûsuf at Illahûn. Here he would have been close to the great brick pyramid whose secret has been wrested from it by Professor Petrie, and here too he would have seen, a little to the south, the city of Herakleopolis, the Ahnas el-Medîneh of to-day, standing on the rubbish-mounds of the past on the eastern bank of the Bahr Yûsuf.”

Source : archive.org 

mercredi 24 août 2011

“Éventrées, (les pyramides) ont gardé leur secret” (Théophile Gautier - XIXe s.)

Théophile Gautier, par Nadar

L’écrivain français Théophile Gautier (1811-1872) se destinait tout d’abord à une carrière de peintre. Puis, suite à une rencontre décisive avec Victor Hugo, il s’orienta vers la littérature.
La critique voit en lui “un esthète, privilégiant d'une manière provocatrice l'esthétique au détriment des autres fonctions de l'œuvre (littéraire)”.
Gautier dédia son Roman de la momie (1858) à Ernest Feydeau, auquel il devait une grande partie de ses connaissances sur l’Égypte, pays où il se rendit en 1869, pour l’inauguration du canal de Suez, et qui occupa une place importante dans son œuvre. L’auteur y trouva l’inspiration de nombreux articles ainsi que de plusieurs de ses ouvrages, dont le livre posthume L’Orient (1882), dont on trouvera ci-dessous quelques extraits.


“Le train marchait rondement, et bientôt vers la droite, au-dessus d'une ligne de verdure presque noire sous l'éblouissante lumière, se dessine, lointaine et teintée d'azur, la silhouette triangulaire des pyramides de Chéops et de Chéfren, pareilles, vues de cette distance, à une montagne unique, échancrée par le sommet. La parfaite transparence de l'air les rapprochait, et il eût été difficile, si on ne l'avait su, d'apprécier avec justesse l'intervalle qui nous séparait. Apercevoir les pyramides en approchant du Caire, rien de plus naturel : on devait s'y attendre et l'on s'y attend ; et pourtant l'on éprouve une émotion et une surprise extraordinaires. On ne saurait s'imaginer l'effet produit par cette silhouette vaporeuse, si légère de ton qu'elle se confondait presque avec la couleur du ciel et que, n'étant pas prévenu, on aurait pu ne pas apercevoir. Ces montagnes factices, les monuments les plus énormes que l'homme ait élevés, après Babel peut-être, depuis plus de cinq mille ans, - presque l'âge du inonde, selon la Bible, - ni les années, ni les barbaries n'ont eu la puissance de les renverser ; notre civilisation même, avec ses énergiques moyens de destruction, y parviendrait à peine.


Illustration de 1878 - auteur inconnu 
Les pyramides ont vu, sur leurs larges bases, les siècles et les dynasties passer comme des vagues de sable, et le sphinx colossal, à la face camarde, sourit toujours à leurs pieds de son sourire ironique et mystérieux. Éventrées, elles ont gardé leur secret et n'ont livré que des ossements de bœuf, auprès d'un sarcophage vide. Des yeux fermés depuis si longtemps que l'Europe n'était peut-être pas encore émergée du déluge, lorsqu'ils contemplaient la lumière, les ont regardées de la place où nous sommes. Elles ont été contemporaines d'empires disparus, de races d'hommes étranges balayées de la terre. Elles ont vu des civilisations qu'on ignore, entendu des langues qu'on cherche à deviner sous les hiéroglyphes, connu des moeurs qui nous paraîtraient chimériques comme un rêve. Elles sont là depuis si longtemps, que les étoiles ont changé de place ; et leurs pointes s'enfoncent dans un passé si prodigieusement fabuleux, que derrière elles il semble qu'on voie luire les premiers jours du monde. (...)
Ensuite notre voyageur (*) se rend au Caire. À un coude du Nil, il aperçoit, noyées dans les clartés du soleil levant, bleuies par le lointain, les pyramides de Giseh dessinant leurs gigantesques triangles, énormes énigmes de pierre posées à l'entrée des solitudes libyques et qui attendent encore leur Oedipe. (...)
L'auteur visite le grand Sphinx de granit rose, dogue fidèle accroupi au pied des Pyramides qu'il garde depuis tant de siècles, sans se lasser de cette faction qui ne finit pas. Il admire sa face camarde et le large sourire épanoui sur ses lèvres épaisses comme une ironie éternelle de la fragilité des choses humaines ; ses oreilles, sur lesquelles retombent les gaufrures des bandelettes sacrées, et qui ont entendu, comme la chute d'un grain de sable, l'écroulement de tant de dynasties ! Les pharaons, les Éthiopiens, les Perses, les Lagides, les Romains, les chrétiens du Bas-Empire, les conquérants arabes, les fatimites (**), les mameluks, les Turcs, les Français, les Anglais, ont tous marché sur son ombre et se sont dispersés comme l'impalpable poudre du désert emportée par le khamsin, et le colosse est toujours là, évasant sa large croupe de monstre, allongeant ses pattes sur le sable en feu, et vous regardant de son visage humain.
L'ascension au sommet de la pyramide de Chéops accomplie, M. Maxime Du Camp pénètre en rampant, par des couloirs pleins de chauves-souris, jusqu'aux chambres intérieures ; mais la pyramide éventrée a gardé son secret et ne laisse voir au curieux qui l'interroge que des parois nues et un sarcophage vide.
Aux pyramides de Sakkara, sœurs naines et contrefaites des grandes pyramides de Giseh, s'effritant au soleil dans un désert pierreux de la plus morne désolation, M. Maxime Du Camp fouille le puits aux ibis, immense cimetière d'animaux sacrés s'étendant à des profondeurs inconnues, et il en retire des vases contenant des momies d'oiseaux gravement emmaillotées de bandelettes et poissées de bitume.”

Source : Gallica

(*) Maxime Du Camp : voir la note de Pyramidales sur cet auteur.

(**) Lire : les “Fatimides”.

mardi 23 août 2011

“On commence par l’indifférence, on finit par l’admiration” (Alphonse Couret - XIXe-XXe s. - à propos des pyramides de Guizeh)

Les récits de pèlerins en route vers la Terre Sainte et faisant une courte halte au pied des pyramides d’Égypte, sont souvent expéditifs lorsqu’ils relatent cette étape sur le plateau de Guizeh.
Tel est le cas de la relation d’Alphonse Couret (1841-1916), comte romain et ancien magistrat, spécialiste de l'histoire de la Palestine. Dans son ouvrage En terre promise. Notes de mon voyage en Égypte et en Palestine, 16 avril-4 juin 1890, publié en 1891, il prend à peine le temps de décrire son “étonnement” et son “admiration” face à la Splendide, à la Grande et à la Supérieure. Ses considérations très générales sont toutefois complétées par une remarque, à l’évidence inspirée par tel ou tel égyptologue (non cité), sur l’ancienneté du Sphinx par rapport à la pyramide de Khéops.

Photo d'Albert et Leonora Newsome (1910)

“À mesure que l'on se rapproche des Pyramides, on les apprécie davantage. Elles sont bien plus étonnantes en tête à tête et de près que de loin. C'est le contraire des bâtons flottants (*) : on commence par l'indifférence, on finit par l'admiration. Ce n'est pas tant leur hauteur, quoique encore fort honorable : 137 mètres ; c'est surtout l'ampleur énorme, la masse, le développement gigantesque, le cube, l'aire de leur base, bien supérieur, ce semble, à leur hauteur ; c'est l'immensité du triangle de blocs formé par la grande pyramide, justement surnommée par les anciens Égyptiens : la Splendide. Quelle masse, quel colosse, quel entassement, quelle vertigineuse accumulation de monolithes ; quelle somme de travail humain cela représente !... Et dire que, aujourd'hui, avec tous les moyens dont la science dispose, il serait peut-être impossible d'exécuter ce gigantesque massif, orienté, paraît-il, avec une précision mathématique et donnant par la comparaison de ses lignes, la relation de son périmètre avec sa hauteur, sa latitude, son poids, l'axe de son entrée et la projection de son ombre sur le sol, la solution mystérieuse des plus précieux problèmes d'astronomie, de mesure et de mécanique.
Les Bédouins eux-mêmes, les Bédouins au cœur de pierre, mendiants, voleurs et dégradés, dont les huttes misérables de boue et de roseaux se cachent à quelque distance dans une déchirure du plateau, à l'ombre d'un maigre palmier, éprouvent confusément l'impression d'accablante grandeur produite par les Pyramides. “Nos ancêtres”, disait le chef des Bédouins à l'un des ecclésiastiques du pèlerinage, “nos ancêtres, grande race, bâtissaient avec de la pierre ; nous, petite race, nous bâtissons avec de la terre !” (1)
Les Pyramides sont au nombre de quatre : deux grandes (2) et deux petites. Tout autour, de nombreux pylônes de taille modeste, tronqués, démolis, mutilés, abattus, et formant comme un respectueux cortège, une cour déférente aux Pyramides monarchiques.
Le plateau sur lequel elles s'élèvent est une nécropole : c'est le Saint-Denis de l'ancienne Égypte. Pharaon dormait dans son cercueil de porphyre, au fond de sa pyramide souveraine, entouré de sa Cour, de ses Grands, de ses femmes, de ses Officiers, pendant que son fantôme, que son double, était préservé des terreurs de l’Amenti par les formules magiques
gravées sur les parois de son sépulcre, et gardé de l'anéantissement par la multiplication de ses images et les précautions minutieuses prises contre la découverte et la profanation de sa momie...
Plus ancien encore, et non moins étonnant que les Pyramides, le Sphinx, le grand Sphinx d'Égypte, énigmatique et grandiose personnification du Soleil-Levant et de la résurrection, devant lequel se sont arrêtés défiants, stupéfaits et sourdement hostiles tous les pèlerins de Jérusalem, depuis Félix Fabri et Bernard de Breydenbach (**) jusqu'à l'abbé de Binos (***).
Il s'élève actuellement du fond d'un entonnoir de sable et de rocher, d'un trou ou vaste bas-fond, et tient, dit-on, entre ses pattes informes, un petit temple d'albâtre et de granit noir ou rose, aujourd'hui recouvert par les sables et dont on distingue seulement la stèle supérieure en granit gris et couverte de pâles hiéroglyphes. Jugez de l'ancienneté de ce temple : il a été restauré par Chéops, le fondateur de la grande Pyramide qui vivait, dit-on, plus de trois mille ans avant Jésus-Christ.
Déjà à cette date, le Sphinx et son temple étaient si vieux qu'ils avaient besoin de réparations urgentes !... De profil, le Sphinx ne dit rien du tout, mais, de face, il a incontestablement l'apparence de la figure humaine, avec vastes oreilles et nez aplati par une énorme cassure.”

(1) Inutile de faire observer que les Bédouins en question ne descendent pas plus des anciens Égyptiens que le Khédive actuel n'est le petit-neveu des Pharaons.
(2) Voici, d'après les Égyptiens d'autrefois, les noms des trois principales Pyramides : la Splendide, fondée par Chéops (autrement dite “la demeure brillante de Choufou”) ; la Grande, oeuvre de Chéphren ; la Supérieure, bâtie par Mencherès, le Mycêrinos des Grecs.

Source : Gallica

Illustration de Gustave Doré
(*) allusion à la fable de La Fontaine Le chameau et les bâtons flottants.
(**) sur cet auteur, voir la note de Pyramidales : ICI   
(***) voir note de Pyramidales : ICI